Culture

Waking up with aXbo S.P.A.C

Posted in Gadgets on March 3rd, 2010 by Øyvind – 6 Comments
The aXbo sleep phase alarm clock

The aXbo sleep phase alarm clock

aXbo is a bio-rhythmic Sleep.Phase.Alarm.Clock promising to revolutionize the way you wake up every morning. Put simple, it works by identifying the different phases of sleep in your sleep cycle based on your amount of body movement. It then wakes you up at a time of light sleep, when you are most likely to feel well and rested. Two months ago I got a new job that requires a two hour commute, which means getting up at 6.30 three days a week. After being a tormented B-person all my life, I decided to buy this device i’d heard about in an attempt to make my mornings easier. I have now used it for a few days, so here’s how it’s working so far.

In practicality

First things first: This is a pricey product, costing just shy of 200 euros for the two-person edition. You buy it from www.axbo.com, an Austrian website which in—typical German tradition—defaults to German. Mine was delivered in two weeks “due to strong demand”. The initial experience was somewhat limp in my case because it wouldn’t charge properly. After some time of emailing with their support people, it seemed that there was a problem with the power adapter/cable. Hence I ripped the front plate off, cut away some purposeless plastic thingies, extracted the three AAA batteries and let them charge in a normal battery charger. That worked while I waited for a new power adapter to arrive in the mail.

Setup is done though the menus on the clock with a couple of buttons and a scroll wheel on the side. Pretty standard stuff. My version is made for two people, and any time you do something relating to only one of them, the corresponding icon is displayed topmost in the LCD (see article image). You get a range of six different wake-up sounds, all surprisingly “alarm-ish” for a device that’s comes across as very gentle in all other aspects. I opted for the chirping birds and went to sleep.

While you sleep—some theory

A wristband is what enables the clock to register body movement. They come in man- and lady-size, one of each in my delivery. Inside it is a removable sensor, and the  Austrians are very specific about wearing it the right way on your left arm.

aXbo wristbands used for recording your movements during sleep

aXbo wristbands used for recording your movements during sleep

As explained thoroughly and way better on the aXbo’s own website, you move less in deep phases of sleep and more in the light ones. The scientists illustrate sleep cycles with a “hypnogramme”, so I thought I’d give it a shot.

A typical, highly simplified hypnogrammeIn order to avoid copyright infringement, I drew you the illustration to the right. It’s not accurate in any way, but it gets the job done in explaining that you first enter a long, deep sleep phase, followed by waves of gradually shorter and lighter ones. This typically goes on for a period of 7-9 hours for a normal adult.

Waking up

If you wake up remembering your dreams, you most likely woke up from a REM-stage. This is better than waking up from deep sleep, but still not ideal. What you want is to wake up from the lightest sleep stage possible, shown as peaks in the hypnogramme. The aXbo predicts your next light sleep phase and wakes you as close as possible within a 30 minute window. Should your sleep cycle be out of sync with the alarm time you’ve set, the alarm will go off at that time. The same goes for if you forget to wear the wristband, or if the batteries are too drained to safely spend them on the sensing.

One thing I particularly like about the aXbo is your lack of choice when it comes to it’s core features. The wake-up window is 30 minutes, and that’s that. No configuration for a two hour snooze. And speaking of fans of the snooze button (we know who we are!), you won’t have much luck here, because there isn’t any. But what you do get is a button on the wristband that lets you turn the backlight on during the night to check how long you’ve gone without falling asleep. And more importantly, it is also used for silencing the alarm after it goes off . I usually feel a little woozy just after waking up (who doesn’t), so I like to sit upright in bed for a couple of minutes before putting my feet on the cold floor. This might be disobedient to the recommendation in the manual that says to get up immediately, but it works for me.

The aXbo glows quite brightly and also illuminates the wall behind it

The aXbo glows when you push the button on the wristband (firmly)

So how does it feeeel?

I’ll be a little cautious for now since I’ve only used it for a few days. But to me this seems like a step forward. The aXbo has yet to wake me up at the precise time I set it to, which can only mean that it has found a better time for me to get up. And so far I have not felt broken and beaten at that time like I usually do. Some mornings however, I have had the pleasure of experiencing something which is a bit of a rarity for me: The feeling of being ready to get out of bed. I suppose it is a little early to attribute it all to the clock, but I’m definitely thinking that there might be something to this device.

I will try to write some more about my experiences with the aXbo after having used it for a month or two. In the mean time, if you want to read up about sleep cycles, sleep phases and what not you probably know where to look.

PS. There’s also free data collection and analysis software for both PC and Mac available from the aXbo website if you want to get utterly German about your sleep. And also, writing the aXbo name with a lowercase “a” and a capital “X” is really not that cool, but apparently that’s its name.

Ads

I just had to link up these hilarious TV ads for the aXbo. I hope their sleep research is better than their metaphors (and the voice actor’s English):

The case for Apples closed platform model

Posted in Culture, Mac on January 29th, 2010 by Øyvind – Be the first to comment

I’m getting really fed up by the unjustified apple bashing that goes on these days. Just 24 hours after the launch of the iPad and the net is overflowing with whining complaints about Apples continuing stance against a more open platform model when it comes to hardware and the App Store. Again.

Before reading on, you probably wonder if I’m a fanboy myself. The answer to that is both yes and no. Yes because there’s no denying the abundance of Apple made devices and solutions that enrich my daily life, both professionally and personnally. No because I have no problem recognizing the faults and strangeness to be found in the Apple eco system. But this is not about Apple in general, but the specific case of the path Apple has chosen when it comes to app third party development, approval and distribution.

Alex Payne writes on his blog:

The iPad demonstrates that if Apple is listening to these complaints, they simply don’t care. This is why I say that the iPad is a cynical thing: Apple can’t – or won’t – conceive of a future for personal computing that is both elegant and open, usable and free.

This pisses me off because it lacks perspective. If a company is manufacturing products in low-cost countries, well aware that the cheap production price comes at a high health price for the workers—and lets face it, maybe Apple is— then that’s cynical. But choosing a strategy that locks as much as possible of the inner workings of a commercial device down, simply isn’t. It might be disappointing at worst. Some argue in their own right that it’s unwise. But the bottom line is that it’s the right of any business, just as it’s the consumers right to choose not to spend their money there. The majority of western world economies are based on this general principle, and whether we like it or not, it applies to Apple as well. Complaining about cynicism in this context tells me you haven’t thought this through.

As explained by Steve and his subordinates on numerous occations, Apple believes they need control over as many aspects of their production and delivery chain as possible in order to deliver the best user experience they can. Remember, this is a belief converted to a strategy that Apple applies to the products they make and own. This has enabled them to create breakthrough products that raises the bar for everyone else in the industry and has led to real paradigm shifts in the way we work, play and communicate. HTC, Nokia/Symbian and the rest haven’t even come close in terms of sales and widespread adoption. No matter how hard you try and pick that statement apart and devaluate it, there’s no denying the fact that the sales, adoption rate and most importantly; customer satisfaction tell the same story. Apple puts this down to the very same platform model that’s been getting the worst of the tech press lately. You may argue that an equal success would have been possible if Apple had taken their combined product design, UI design and engineering wizardry and walked the open road, and you may even be proven right one day. But so far that’s been the path of their jealous competitors.

What I explain to many fresh switchers from PC to Mac is that to get the best experience you kind of have to buy into the whole eco system of the Mac. I don’t particularly like to give that advice, but it’s the truth. Apple has a vision. Where that vision deviates from many other’s is in the holistic nature of it; the fact that Apple products are designed to work best with other Apple (approved) products and to make more decisions and assumptions on the user’s behalf. To make all this possible it makes sense to control larger parts of the environment the product lives in.

As a user interface developer, I’m the middle man between the designer and the back end developers, which puts me at the center of UI/business logic debate. From this experience I know how challenging it can be to get a success from the collaboration involving just three creators that might even be used to working with each other. The designer has the vision, I may share it and execute it or break it depending on several factors. The backend guy might do either himself. Expand that example to involving, hardware, firmware, OS, software, peripherals and third party providers, and you can easily see why anyone might choose to keep this all under the same roof, within the same company culture, under the same visionary leader. You can easily say it’s hard enough as it is without providing the means for others to mess with it all they want.

I suspect that inside most of us, we like the idea of openness an sharing. I’m no different and as a Flash Developer I try to make my own contribution whenever I can. If Apple were to go 180 in the question of an open platform, I would certainly applaud them for it. Until then I’m a generally happy, relatively IT problem-free participant in the Apple eco system.

…and I’m not getting an iSlate iTablet iTampon iPad because I also think it’s an oversized iPod Touch and I don’t have a need for it. Loving my iPhone though!

EDIT: A few links to great posts on the subject:

Swimming moose and my following 15 minutes

Posted in General thoughts, Photography on April 16th, 2009 by Øyvind – 1 Comment

Moose in sunwind

My co-worker Jacob called me up right before 2 pm today to tip me off about a moose swimming in Sandefjord bay. I rushed out with camera in hand and just then it passed me. I was at work and our offices are located right next to the water, and so I snapped this shot.

Now, I didn’t even know these animals could swim, so I was quite surprised. As soon as I got back to my desk I Twittered the incident and uploaded the picture to TwitPic. My Tweet was Re-Tweeted I don’t know how many times, but the picture was viewed by 140 people within the first 15 minutes. And then the Norwegian TV station TV2 called and wanted to interview me and use the picture. The article can be found here.

So I made the news today. Me and a moose.